Risk of cervical cancer and high-grade lesions in vulnerable women a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal: Nature communications

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether socially and medically vulnerable women in high- and upper-middle-income countries have elevated risks of high-grade cervical lesions and cervical cancer.

Populations included:

  • Women with low socioeconomic status
  • Migrants
  • Prisoners
  • Sex workers
  • Women with substance use disorders
  • Women with mental illness
  • Women living with HIV

Methods:

  • Searches across four databases for studies up to February 2024 (from 2004 onward for HIV-related studies)
  • 127 studies included
  • Risk of bias evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale
  • Analyses restricted to biologically defined females, using sex as reported by study authors
  • Primary outcome: pooled risk of cervical cancer and high-grade cervical lesions vs. non-vulnerable comparison groups
  • Secondary outcome: risk by specific vulnerable subgroup

Key findings:

  • Higher risk of cervical cancer among vulnerable women: Relative risk (RR) 2.78; 95% CI 2.32–3.32
  • Higher risk of high-grade cervical lesions: RR 2.50; 95% CI 2.05–3.04
  • High heterogeneity across studies, reflecting differences in populations, settings, and methodologies

Clinical and public health implication:

The consistently elevated risks across vulnerable groups support prioritizing equity-focused cervical cancer prevention strategies, including targeted screening, HPV vaccination, and tailored outreach to these populations within otherwise high-resource healthcare systems.

Leave a Reply