Comparable outcomes of HSCT up-front and after failure of IST in pediatric aplastic anemia in recent years.

Journal: Blood advances

Study type

  • Retrospective analysis of 179 children with severe aplastic anemia undergoing allogeneic HSCT.

Cohorts

  • Up-front HSCT: 87 patients.
  • HSCT after failure of immunosuppressive therapy (IST): 92 patients.

Follow-up and key outcomes

  • Median follow-up after HSCT: 4.0 years (range 0.2–10.7).
  • Survival at last follow-up: 161/179 patients alive.
  • Cumulative incidence:
    • Graft failure: 10%
    • Grade 2–4 acute GVHD: 18%
    • Chronic GVHD: 8%
  • Five-year outcomes for the entire cohort:
    • Overall survival (OS): 89%
    • GVHD-free, relapse/rejection-free survival (GRFS): 79%

Donor type and timing

  • Up-front HSCT from either:
    • Matched sibling donor (MSD)
    • ≥9/10 HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD)
  • Overall survival (OS) for both up-front MSD and MUD HSCT: 95%.

Impact of prior IST

  • OS was better with up-front HSCT vs HSCT after IST failure (overall timeframe):
    • Up-front: 95% (95% CI, 89–100)
    • After IST failure: 83% (95% CI, 75–91); P < .01
  • From 2015 onward, outcomes for HSCT after IST failure improved:
    • Up-front HSCT OS: 97%
    • HSCT after IST failure OS: 89%; P = .09 (no longer significantly different)
  • For MUD transplants, GRFS did not differ by timing:
    • Up-front: 77%
    • After IST failure: 76% (not statistically significant)

Clinical implications

  • Pediatric SAA HSCT outcomes are excellent overall, with low graft failure and relatively low clinically significant GVHD.
  • When a matched sibling is unavailable, up-front HSCT from a well-matched unrelated donor is a strong option.
  • Modern HSCT after IST failure, using well-matched unrelated donors, now achieves outcomes approaching those of up-front transplantation.

Leave a Reply