Intimate Demographic Questions: Are Patients With Cancer Comfortable Answering?

Journal: The American journal of hospice & palliative care

Study question

  • The study evaluated how comfortable adult oncology patients are answering sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) questions in a clinical context, and whether changing the order of more commonly used versus debated/less familiar terms alters comfort.

Methods

  • Cancer patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 survey versions.
  • Both versions contained seven identical SOGI questions but differed in the sequence of response options (e.g., placing terms like “genderqueer” earlier vs later).
  • Comfort was rated on a 5‑point Likert scale (1 = very uncomfortable, 5 = very comfortable).
  • Primary endpoint: proportion of patients reporting comfort (4 or 5) with the question “Do you consider yourself to be…”, which included 12 response options (such as genderqueer).
  • Secondary endpoints: differences in comfort by question order and by demographic factors; qualitative analysis of free‑text comments.

Key results

  • 74% of patients (95% CI 70–78%) reported being comfortable with the main SOGI identity question.
  • Similar comfort levels were observed for the other SOGI questions.
  • No significant differences in comfort were detected based on question sequence or patient demographics.

Qualitative themes from comments

  • Emotional reactions to question structure (e.g., concerns that wording remained “essentially gender binary”).
  • Emotional reactions toward SOGI content (e.g., perception of “bending over backwards to be politically correct”).
  • Concerns about privacy and clinical relevance (e.g., uncertainty why SOGI data are needed for cancer care).
  • Constructive feedback (e.g., unfamiliarity with terms like “cisgender” and requests for definitions).

Conclusions and implications for practice

  • Most patients with cancer are comfortable answering SOGI questions in oncology settings.
  • Comfort may be further improved by:
    • Clarifying terminology (e.g., defining less familiar terms).
    • Adjusting wording to reduce perceived binary framing.
    • Briefly explaining why SOGI information is relevant to cancer care and assuring privacy.

Leave a Reply