Comparison of Indocyanine Green Versus Isosulfan Blue in Melanoma Sentinel Node Biopsy.

Journal: Annals of surgical oncology

Study type
Retrospective single-center cohort (2012–2024) of 375 consecutive patients with cutaneous melanoma undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).

Intervention and comparison

  • All patients had technetium-99m radioisotope (RI) mapping.
  • Adjunct tracer was either:
    • Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence + RI (n=170), or
    • Isosulfan blue (IB) + RI (n=215).

Endpoints

  • Primary: Intraoperative concordance of the dye (ICG or IB) with RI for SLN detection at patient and node levels.
  • Secondary: Detection of pathology-positive nodes, tracer discordance, adverse events, and AI-assisted identification of dye-positive/RI-negative (“dye-rescued”) SLNs.

Key results

  • Cohort: 375 patients (median age 62; 54.7% male); 890 SLNs excised.
  • Concordance with RI (ICG vs IB):
    • Per patient: 98.6% vs 34.8%
    • Per node: 97.7% vs 34.9% (p<0.001 for both).
  • Discordance: Dye and RI not matching was much lower with ICG (1.4%) than IB (65.2%).
  • Pathology-positive nodes: All pathology-positive nodes in the ICG group were localized intraoperatively, versus only 53.4% in the IB group.
  • Safety: No tracer-related allergic reactions were observed.
  • AI-assisted review: Confirmed 9 ICG and 1 IB cases in which dye-positive/RI-negative nodes were “rescued” by the dye.

Clinical interpretation
ICG fluorescence, used with RI, showed markedly higher concordance than IB with RI and more reliable intraoperative detection of pathology-positive SLNs, without added safety concerns. These data support ICG as a superior adjunct tracer to IB for melanoma SLNB in this setting.

Leave a Reply